Saturday, May 01, 1993

The effect of the exhaustion of Australia's indigenous petroleum resources

"It is no exaggeration to say that the majority of the world's population, many leaders of industry and many persons in important political positions DO NOT HAVE THE FAINTEST IDEA OF THE GRAVITY OF THE POWER PROBLEM with which we will all be faced by about the MIDDLE OF THE EIGHTIES and which will grow more dramatic in each succeeding year."

From a speech by Mr. E.R. Meyer, Chairman & Chief Executive
of Swiss Aluminium Ltd., on 23rd September, 1977, in Florence
to the Organisation of European Aluminium Smelters.


We have for some time been deeply concerned about the effects upon Australia and its people arising from the exhaustion of the country's known indigenous petroleum resources;  the expected remaining life of known reserves;  the possibilities of new discoveries;  the cost of replacing domestic production by imports;  the possibilities of conservation and of substitute alternatives and supplementary energies.  For the purpose of examing this matter, we set up a special Committee whose names are appended to this report.

The magnitude of the problem which could develop over the next seven years is not difficult to define with reasonable accuracy:

  • Total petroleum consumption today in Australia is about 90,000 tonnes per day, of which roughly half is used in transportation and the remainder in industry, domestic and commercial.  Of the estimated 45,000 tonnes used daily in transportation approximately half is used in private vehicle operation.
  • Australia produces 70 per cent of its petroleum requirements and imports the remainder.  Unless additional and major discoveries are made, the position will be reversed in seven years and will continue to worsen dramatically thereafter until total import is necessary.
  • By 1985 Australia's petroleum import bill will -- unless action is taken -- be some $2.5 billion on present day values -- equal to the total of the country's present overseas reserves.

The solution to the problem -- and there are many components in the answer -- is more difficult to evaluate partly because of the advanced technologies involved and partly because of the economic and social changes in life styles which will inevitably ensue.

What can at least be seen is that action must be taken NOW -- that in fact it is time to make not a stride but a giant step -- if Australia's future energy dilemma is to be diminished or solved.  Included in that action must be a major and sustained educational programme which will embrace all levels of government, associations, corporations, schools and indeed through to the man in the street and to the housewife.

Three important papers are attached to this Report:

Appendix 1. Observations on the effect of possible conservation measures

Appendix 2. Alternative sources of energy

Appendix 3. Future Petroleum Supply/Demand.

The more detailed observations in this Report highlight the possible impact upon the life styles of people in this country of the dilemma arising from the exhaustion of Australia's indigenous petroleum resources.

In terms of conservation -- that is making what Australia has last longer -- the following is a suggested programme.

TRANSPORTATION:


Road Vehicles:
  • Weight reduction
  • Improved air resistance design
  • Improved engine efficiency
  • Development of electric or hybrid vehicles
  • Modification or elimination of emission control rules
  • Eliminate road taxes and recover via fuel pricing.
  • Acceleration of the move to shift fuel prices to world parity will allow the market forces to play their part in fuel conservation

Traffic:
  • Eliminate legal impediments to encourage car pooling and multiple usage
  • Stagger working hours
  • Improve traffic control equipment and techniques
  • Eliminate tolls on roadways

Fuels:
  • Maximise use of natural L.P. gas, particularly in truck, bus and taxi modes
  • Blends with chemical fuels -- fossil fuel methanol, ethanol from agricultural sources
  • Encourage feasibility studies in the oil-from-coal processes

Rail:
  • Rail transport conversion to electric traction
  • Convert to natural L.P. gas at overhaul
  • Promotion of rail transport v. road

INDUSTRY AND DOMESTIC:


Industry:
  • Incentives to use rail haulage
  • Convert to coal-fired steam generation where practicable and appropriate
  • Convert to natural gas where practicable and appropriate and where conversion to coal usage uneconomic
  • Improve building insulation

General:
  • Encourage driving schools with accent on efficient driving
  • Motor sport accent to be on economy runs

Dealing with a number of these headings in greater, but nevertheless abbreviated detail:


IMPROVED ENGINE EFFICIENCY:

Well validated overseas development of the Direct Injection Stratified Charge (DISC) engine, indicates a 25% reduction in fuel consumption.


HYBRID VEHICLES:

Recent developments by the automotive industry indicate the possibility of long-distance vehicles of hybrid engine design becoming viable.  The U.S. Department of Energy has allocated $35 million for further research.  Present development indicates a one-tonne vehicle, petrol-electric, can achieve 55 mpg against similar vehicle's 25 mpg on petrol alone.


EMISSION CONTROL:

It is noted that some progress has been made already in deferment of further emission control rules.  It is estimated that such controls add at least 10% to fuel consumption.


TOLLWAYS:

Peak-hour queueing at toll collection points such as the Harbour Bridge in Sydney resulting in lengthy idling periods is a major waste of fuel and cause of pollution.  Elimination of toll collection is opposed by some groups, while others seek to increase the charge.  It is recognised that removal of toll points must be a part of wider traffic flow planning to ensure that such removal does not merely shift the traffic block at peak times to other points.


CAR POOLING:

Presently this is specifically excluded in New South Wales and this would have to be exempted to achieve significant passenger-mile increase.


STAGGERED WORKING HOURS:

Flexitime in some Government departments has achieved desirable results in Canberra.  A change in shopping hours, say from 10 am to 6 pm, would achieve major easing of public transport congestion.


FUELS -LPG:

Requires special storage facilities and equipment on vehicles and the safety problem probably limits the areas where it can be used.  It is most suited for use in urban transport or large vehicle fleets.  In the case of buses and trucks LPG can be used as a topping agent in diesel engines, having a particular benefit in reducing smoke emission under heavy load.  In spark ignition engines the most satisfactory use is by means of "fleet vehicle engines" designed to make full use of the high compression capabilities of the fuel and for the necessary valve seats to ensure long life.


FUELS -LNG:

Has been demonstrated in the U.S. as a potential fleet vehicle fuel and is of greater significance in Australia with our relatively greater reserves.


CHEMICAL BLENDS:

These are essentially medium to long-range measures, but 10% to 15% extension of premium grade fuel can be achieved with either methanol or ethanol without modification to existing engines.


RAIL ELECTRIFICATION:

The electrical railway system should be extended and improved with examination of the usage of high voltage system and modification of existing diesel locomotives.


LPG CONVERSION:

Conversion of diesel locomotives to LPG operation is based on the fact that there is adequate fuel carrying capability to ensure a reasonable range on LPG and the number of units so converted can be controlled to match the market availability of LPG to its consumption.  Conversion should be made at major overhauls.


INDUSTRY:

Wherever the scale of operations so justifies, the conversion to coal usage should be encouraged and particular attention paid to atmospheric pollution control and solid fuel ash disposal.  For the large number of medium to small scale operations where the capital cost of conversion to coal usage is uneconomic, conversion to natural gas is suggested because of the smaller capital investment involved.


INSULATION:

Far greater attention should be paid to improved insulation methods in commercial, industrial and domestic buildings.  Such attention is most readily achieved at the design stage, but significant benefits can be obtained by retro-fit.


The foregoing proposals are by no means exhaustive and we considered many other ideas and suggestions.  In the field of substitute fuels it should perhaps be explained that no reference to uranium as a power source has been made.  This important material was excluded because its development as a source of energy required a time span falling outside our examination of the energy problem developing and accelerating over the next seven years.

Much of the information contained in the technical papers embodied in this Report is already known to Government Departments but the information has been summarised in this Report in order to alert those who do not have ready access to such technical information to appreciate the gravity of the dilemma and the need for immediate action.

In the implementation of conservation programmes there may well be measures which will not be properly understood and indeed may be unpopular with the people and in this connection we may be able to offer our services in the role of interpreting to the people the rationale of Government measures relating to conservation.

H.R. BEARDSMORE,
May 1978.



PETROLEUM CONSUMPTION IN AUSTRALIA:  OBSERVATIONS ON THE EFFECT OF POSSIBLE CONSERVATION MEASURES

ABSTRACT

Australia will import most of its petroleum requirements as indigenous petroleum supplies decline over the next 10 years.  This may amount to an import bill of some $2500 million per year by about 1985 (in present values and at today's prices).

While we may be able to increase export earnings to offset this, it should be possible to reduce the import cost by around $600 million per year (in present values) by conservation.

Transportation and industry are the two major petroleum consuming sectors in Australia and are consequently the areas where greatest savings can be achieved.  As substitute fuels become more widely used even greater reductions will occur in petroleum consumption.

Individuals, through consumer pressure on manufacturers, can promote the use of fuel conservation measures in the community.  All levels of government, however, need to initiate conservation programmes, provide incentives and remove inhibiting aspects in existing legislative and administrative controls.


  1. AUSTRALIA AND THE ENERGY CRISIS

    Australia is well endowed with energy resources compared with many other industrialised nations.  We export coal and will probably become a significant exporter of uranium and liquified natural gas.

    Our reserves of petroleum are seriously limited, however, and the effect of this is dramatically shown in Figure 1, which compares expected consumption with expected supply from known indigenous reserves.

    Figure 1. Australia -- Oil Supply and Demand.

    Note:  The vertical lines at 1975 and 1986 have been superimposed by us on the Esso chart.


    From 70% self-sufficiency in the 1973-76 period, Australia seems likely to be forced to 70% dependence on imported petroleum by 1986.  At current world prices this could cost us some $2500 million per year, a sum roughly equal to our current total overseas reserves.

    Whilst sufficient growth is expected to occur in Australia's exports to cover this import bill the impact for Australians will be the increase in local petroleum prices to import parity.  This means, for example, an increase in retail petrol prices of at least 40% in today's values.

    The supply situation for petroleum will be improved if altenative sources of liquid fuels become available, such as oil from coal, oil from shale and alcohol from crops.  Also liquid fuels will be produced when natural gas reserves are tapped.

    The demand situation for petroleum will be eased where other forms of energy can be substituted or energy wastage is reduced.  The National Energy Advisory Committee (NEAC) has recently suggested that Australia's 1985 petroleum demand could be 15% lower if conservation measures were adopted.  Such a reduction would represent an annual saving to the community of some $600 million (in present values).

    How can such a saving be achieved?  It is interesting to examine where petroleum is consumed in Australia.  Figure 2 shows that the major targets for possible savings are the transportation and industrial sectors.  Consumption of petroleum by commercial, domestic and power generation users is relatively insignificant in Australia, in contrast to Japan and Western Europe.

    Figure 2. Pattern of Petroleum Consumption in Australia -- Total


  2. TRANSPORTATION SECTOR.

    As shown in Figure 2, the transportation sector represents over half of Australia's consumption of petroleum.  This is broken down in Figure 3, to disclose the large share being consumed by cars and station wagons.

    Figure 3. Pattern of Petroleum Consumption in Australia -- Transportation Sector


    Significant savings appear possible in the road transport sector (i.e. cars, motor cycles, station wagons, buses, trucks, etc) which accounts for 81% of the transportation sector and 43% of Australia's total petroleum consumption.  Of this road transport sector about three-quarters of the consumption is classified as "personal".

    The increase in petrol price will tend to reduce personal consumption but overseas experience suggests that consumers are slow to respond to petrol price increases.

    Reductions in fuel consumption can be achieved through vehicle design, reduction in the use of private cars, improved traffic management and better land use planning.  There is, however, a need for governments, both State and Federal, to take legislative and administration initiatives that will induce petroleum conservation.  Table 1 attached hereto reviews the question of initiating sources.

    Unlike the USA, the Australian Government has not prescribed targets for a fleet average fuel consumption.  In the USA this target is 8.6 litres per 100 km by 1985.  Currently average fuel consumption for Australian cars is 12 litres per 100 km, thus if we are to match the targets set by the USA we need to improve our fuel economy in motor vehicles by some 30% in a period of 7 years.  The setting of targets by the Federal or State Governments similar to those in the USA and Canada would promote more rapid inclusion of fuel saving features into Australian manufactured cars.  These design modifications have the potential to improve the fuel economy in modern vehicles by the 30% suggested.  Some of these modifications include:

    • Vehicle shapes which reduce air resistance.  This is particularly significant in open road conditions i.e. over 70 km/hr.  Some 25% of engine output is consumed in overcoming air resistance and it is estimated over 30% of this resistance could be designed out.
    • Reduction in vehicle weight.  Will be achieved by manufacturing fewer large cars and utilizing light weight materials in their construction.  These materials will include low alloy steel for structural members, magnesium and aluminium in engines, etc, and a wide range of plastics both in structural components and in impact areas.
    • Improved engine performance.  Increased compression ratios, under -- rather than over -- powered cars, and fuel injection systems will all contribute to more efficient petroleum use.  Diesel engines can achieve compression ratios far greater than petrol engines and are consequently typically 50% more efficient.  Numerous overseas vehicle manufacturers, particularly in Europe, have developed diesel engines suitable for private vehicles.
    • More efficient transmission can be achieved by manual gearboxes which are able to match road speed and engine speed more precisely than automatic gearboxes.  Similarly overdrive gears promote fuel efficiency as do the use of steel belted radial tyres.

    While Government guidelines could encourage manufacturers to incorporate these fuel conservation features in new vehicles, individuals, by selecting fuel efficient vehicles can also influence manufacturers.  Taxes on large cars and subsidies for small cars, similar to those proposed in President Carter's energy programme, would influence the consumer demand for small cars.

    Reduction in the use of private vehicles, as previously noted, has not been sharply reduced by increases in petroleum prices where this has occurred overseas.  Rationing of petrol or limiting vehicle access to the central business district (CBD) etc, are more direct and consequently more socially disruptive and it is for this reason regulatory controls on manufacturers have been more widely adopted overseas.  Mass transit systems operate most efficiently in the densely populated corridors of our cities where they carry passengers at a fuel efficiency 2 or 4 times greater than the private vehicle currently can.  Private vehicles, however, operate most efficiently under leisure motoring conditions with low congestion and high occupancy.  Likely vehicle design modifications will increase the efficiencies of private vehicles for non-peak hour running and so highlight the advantageous role of mass transit as a means of fuel conservation and rapid travel for peak hour traffic.

    Staggered working hours has the effect of spreading peak hours and may enable public transport to operate more efficiently, particularly if working hours were staggered by location permitting more equal patronage of outward and return journeys.

    Car pooling to increase occupancy rates and reduce private vehicle usage can permit fuel savings at no capital cost.  It is estimated that a doubling of occupancy rate in work trips in urban areas could reduce our total petroleum consumption by 1 to 2%.  State Governments would need to make the necessary amendments to Traffic Acts to encourage this.


    Fuel Consumption

    Improving traffic flow by better traffic management is a further way petroleum consumption may be reduced.  In open road conditions the maximum speed is the important factor although attempts to reduce road speeds are reported to have had limited success.  Studies have shown fuel consumption in urban areas is closely correlated with average speed, number of stops and time spent queueing.  Better traffic flow can be achieved by synchronizing traffic lights, lane changing, one way streets, etc.  For example in Sydney at peak hour average speeds are low and more than 50% of the time car engines operate under idle or no load conditions.  A 3 kph increase in the traffic speed in the most congested areas (i.e. the CBD and adjacent) would support an investment of some $30 million per year.  Improvement in traffic flow is an ongoing activity, however, and at present improvements through better management are absorbed by increasing numbers of vehicles rather than more rapid vehicle movement.

    In the long term land use planning must play a role in reducing the need to travel, particularly for work related trips.  Appropriate planning to locate employment, education and recreation activities closer to residential areas would reduce the need to travel and could promote non-motorised transport.  To achieve this State and Local Governments must make provision in both regional and local planning schemes to permit a wider range of land use activities.

    Our supplies of petroleum can be conserved by substituting alternative fuels of which there are several available in Australia.  As petrol prices increase, these alternative fuels will become more attractive to the consumer.

    Liquified petroleum gas (LPG) is an unavoidable part of oil and natural gas streams.  At present the majority of Australia's production is exported.  Unlike liquified natural gas (LNG), LPG can be stored in comparatively light weight cylinders since it is liquified at relatively low pressures.  It can be used as a complete or partial substitute for super or standard grade petrol in internal combustion engines at a conversion cost estimated in 1974 to be approximately $500 per vehicle.  LPG can offer a number of advantages over petroleum.  Cleaner combustion and a gaseous form of entry to the combustion chamber reduce engine wear and maintenance costs, and promote easier "cold starts".  Conversely, LPG yields a heat output 20% lower than petrol on an equivalent volume basis.  Gas cylinders occupy valuable space and require regular inspection.

    Ethanol (ethyl alcohol) could be produced in Australia as a substitute fuel using agricultural crops such as grains, sugar and cassava.  Methanol (methyl alcohol) can be produced from the methane present in natural gas or from coal.  These alcohols, can be used as a complete or partial substitute for petroleum and have similar advantages to LPG from a pollution viewpoint.  Substitution to 15% in alcohol/gasoline blends is being considered.


    Electric Cars

    Electric cars are currently being developed both overseas and in Australia.  The major limitation of electric vehicles is the restricted range permitted by battery capacity.  Vehicles developed to date have largely utilised the lead acid battery which, although economical at low outputs is inefficient at high output and rapidly increases the weight of the vehicle.  These limitations imposed by the lead acid battery have resulted in most vehicles developed to date being designed for use in the urban situation where a range of 70 km is adequate for normal daily requirements.  The limitation in range is likely to permit the electric vehicle to become popular only as a service or delivery vehicle or to a very limited extent as a second vehicle in some households.

    The sodium sulphur battery is capable of approximately five times the energy output per unit weight of the lead battery and may significantly extend the range of battery operated cars provided a safe method of enclosing the battery is developed since the sodium reacts vigorously with water and operation is at 350°C.

    While electric vehicles are currently being developed, provision of charging points in urban areas and at homes and the cost of vehicles and battery replacements, the electric car is not considered likely to become widely used within the next 20 years.  Other substitute fuels which may become of increasing significance include liquified natural gas and in the longer term the hydrogen fuelled internal combustion engine.

    For several of these fuel types the technology is insufficiently developed, however, alternative fuels can be expected to increase in significance and may substitute for as much as 20% of our petroleum needs within 20 years.


  3. INDUSTRIAL SECTOR

    In Australia, primary and secondary industry represents about 41% of total petroleum consumption.  In spite of this relatively high usage, recent studies have shown that consumption of energy by Australian industry is not effectively audited.

    Obvious ways of reducing energy loss include heat insulation, elimination of steam and hot water losses, and minimising non-productive operation of equipment.  In addition factories can be designed for better use of waste heat and better integration of operations (e.g. use of pass out steam from power stations for suitable industrial processes).

    The demand for petroleum by industry can also be significantly reduced in steam generation by burning coal or natural gas wherever possible.  Coal would be preferable because of the very large reserves in Australia and the high opportunity cost of natural gas (a valuable petrochemical feedstock).

    For industries using largely low grade heat, ultimately solar energy, may contribute as a substitute energy source.

    For direct heating situations petroleum can usually be replaced by natural gas, if available.  A recent study suggests that in the short term some 12% substitution of petroleum by coal and natural gas could be achieved in Australian industry.  These substitution levels are not as great as those predicted by some other industrialised nations largely because our industries are in general less dependent on petroleum.  For example the largest demand for energy in the industrial sector is the steel industry which in Australia uses coal to satisfy 85% of its energy demand and oil 8%.  By comparison the steel industry of other nations use lower proportions of coal -- UK 52%, Japan 70% and USA 74%.

    If industries are to reduce their consumption of petroleum by conservation and substitution, they must firstly establish their energy use pattern by conducting an energy "audit".  Many industries, particularly smaller enterprises, do not have the personnel to conduct such studies and government advisory services could assist in this.  The involvement and enthusiasm of management in both large and small companies is required to effectively implement conservation programmes.  Professional institutes have a considerable responsibility in communicating to management the potential savings available.  Table 1 attached hereto shows possible actions that may contribute to reducing petroleum demand.


  4. DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL SECTOR

    This sector represents only 4% of Australia's petroleum consumption, the principal use being heating of buildings.

    As in industry, savings are possible by heat insulation, avoidance of waste, and efficient use of heating equipment.  Building design can have a significant effect on energy consumption.  Studies undertaken by the Building Research Division of the CSIRO have shown that for a typical brick veneer home (in Victoria) of 130m2 with commercially available insulation materials installed in both walls and roof, savings of up to 50% can be achieved in the heating energy requirement.  Improvements in building design and materials can be expected to increase these areas of potential savings.

    In this domestic and commercial sector, petroleum can be replaced by natural gas for space heating and this is occurring in many Australian cities.  Solar energy will increasingly provide an alternative for water heating in domestic and commercial installations but this will mainly impact on electric power consumption.

    While this sector is not a major consumer of petroleum, reduction of heat losses and substitution (principally by natural gas) may enable us to halve the predicted petroleum demand for 1990 in this sector and thereby reduce by 2% our overall petroleum consumption.  To implement these energy conservation measures in both commercial and domestic buildings will require encouragement from governments at all levels and a recognition by architects, builders and building operators that energy savings are achievable.  Measures to accomplish this may include:

    • Investment allowances or other financial incentives to encourage construction of thermally efficient buildings incorporating suitable materials and energy conserving devices.
    • Alteration to building codes and regulations where necessary to permit improved efficiency of energy use in buildings.
    • Publication of design procedures to assess energy consumption in buildings and manuals or training programmes be made available for building operators and maintenance staff.

  5. POWER GENERATION

    Power generation in Australia utilises only about 2% of our petroleum consumption.  Almost all of the electricity is generated in coal fired power stations or hydroelectric schemes.

    About one third of the petroleum used in power generation is diesel or similar light oils and is used in isolated locations.  The rest is furnace oil used for support firing in coal burning power stations.  In neither case can significant substitution or usage reduction be achieved in the short term, although there will be some wind power and solar power applications and in a few cases (e.g. Western Australia) oil fired electric power stations will be converted to burn coal.

    In the longer term it makes sense to have part of our coal resources which are relatively large committed as feedstock for the manufacture of liquid fuels substituting for petroleum.


SUMMARY

The decline in our reserves of petroleum and the increased cost of imports clearly indicate the urgent need to institute conservation measures.

Only limited savings can be achieved in the commercial, domestic and power generation sectors because of the relatively small quantities of petroleum used in these areas.  Nevertheless by reduction of waste and by substitution by other fuels savings of some 3% could be achieved in the relatively short term.

In industry it has been shown that substantial savings can be achieved by energy "house-keeping".  Industry needs to audit its energy usage in order to achieve these savings.  Principal substitute fuels for industry will be coal and natural gas, but solar energy may also contribute as a source of low level heat for some industrial processes.  Substitution by these fuels could reduce petroleum consumption by 15% to 20%.

Transportation represents over half of our petroleum consumption and savings in the order of 10 to 15% could be achieved by improved vehicle design, reduced use of private vehicles and improved traffic management.  Many of the conservation measures such as increased use of mass transit systems, car pooling and smaller cars, etc, involve relatively small capital and social costs.  Substitute fuels are available and suitable for use in vehicles.  Substitute fuels often involve substantial conversion costs and time to develop adequate distribution systems and outlets.  With the rapid decrease in availability of cheap petroleum, substitute fuels can be expected to become increasingly economic.

While consumer pressures and the increase in petroleum prices will encourage conservation, there is a vital role for all levels of government to play if socially disruptive measures such as petrol rationing and limits on mobility are to be avoided.  Possible initiatives are summarised in Table 1 and include a national programme on energy use and conservation with appropriate financial support for research and implementation.  Suitable targets could be established for vehicle fuel consumption and advisory services instituted to assist industry in reducing energy loss.  Taxation concessions such as investment allowances, etc, would stimulate both commercial and private investment in energy conservation and conversion equipment.  Through investment in improved mass transit systems and traffic management, suitable planning and development schemes, and flexible building codes, state and local governments could promote the more efficient use of energy and reduce petroleum demand in the community.

Table 2 attached hereto summarises the possible (high and low estimates) reductions in 1985 petroleum consumption which could be achieved in the various sectors by conservation and substitution measures.

TABLE 1:  POSSIBLE INITIATIVES TO FOSTER THE
CONSERVATION AND SUBSTITUTION OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

INITIATIVES REQUIREDPRINCIPAL INTTIATORS
Establishment of a national energy policy which will state strategies for energy use and conservation and promote and support an investment to achieve such strategies.Federal Government
Offer incentives (and maybe use penalties) to encourage investment of all sections of the community in energy efficient equipment or in modifications necessary to utilise petroleum substitutes.Federal Government
To keep as many options open as possible, establish technical programmes to develop and improve technology for substitute fuels, etc.Federal/State Governments and Industry
Establishment of fuel economy standards for vehicles and review of the timetable for reducing permissible exhaust emission levels and the impact these may have on petroleum consumption.Federal/State Governments and Professional and Industrial Associations
Vehicle fleets could support fuel conservation by increasing the percentage of smaller vehicles, etc, and lead the way in establishing fuel economy consciousness.Federal/State/Local Government Private Enterprise
Establishment of advisory service to industry to assist in auditing energy use and implementing programmes to reduce petroleum consumption.Federal/State Governments
Increase investment in mass transit systems where appropriate to improve service and increase patronage and amend legislation to encourage car pooling.State Government
Improve traffic management in urban areas to reduce inefficient peak-hour travel.State/Local Government
Amend planning schemes and building codes, etc, so they are sufficiently flexible to permit a suitable blend of land uses and innovations in building materials and design to be applied.  Publication of manuals and guidelines for engineers, planners, architects, etc, to highlight the potential savings currently available.State/Local Governments Professional Institutes and Societies
Use consumer pressure to influence manufacturers by recommending and promoting goods which are fuel efficient and/or which utilise substitute fuels.Consumer and Like Organisations

TABLE 2:  AUSTRALIAN PETROLEUM USAGE POSSIBLE REDUCTIONS

SECTOR +PERCENTAGE OF EXPECTED
PETROLEUM USAGE IN 1985
LIKELY SUBSTITUTE
ENERGY SOURCES
CONSERVATIONSUBSTITUTION
LowHighLowHighPre-1985Post 1985
Transportation1015*5Alcohols
LPG
Alcohols
LPG
Electricity
LNG
Hydrogen
Industrial5101520Coal
Nat. Gas
Coal
Electricity
Solar
Commercial/Domestic*2*2Nat. Gas
Electricity
Solar
Electricity
Solar
Wind
Power Generation*1*1CoalCoal
Nuclear
Solar

* Of minor significance

+ Present usage pattern (See Fig 2) is:  Transportation 53%, Industrial 41%, Comm/Dom 4%, Power Gen 2%


ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF ENERGY

SUMMARY

In reviewing the position in regard to Australia's Energy needs, liquid fuel is critical in regard to transport, one of the country's most important services.

Crude Petroleum reserves are small by world standards and, unless exploration locates significant deposits, can be expected to give reduced production in the late '80s.

In reviewing the transport options, sight must never be lost of the value of petroleum as a chemical feedstock.  Its value as a molecule may greatly exceed its convenience as a transport fuel.

Lead times for the various options can be decisive in the run-down situation in which we find ourselves.

  • Refinery operations are being constantly updated to give optimum yield within the VFR (vehicle, fuel, refinery) system as limited by environmental requirements.

  • Natural L.P.G. requires change of vehicle power plant and could be mobilised into urban fleets, say, over five years using special "fleet" vehicles fitted with pressure storage and specially designed cylinder leads.

  • Technology is well established for methanol production and lead times of 5-7 years after decision date are likely if petroleum residuals or natural gas is used.  Coal would require longer to develop extraction infrastructure.

  • Ethanol requires a massive agricultural complex in addition to fermentation and distillation capacity.  Technology is available but infrastructure and agricultural expansion seem to indicate some 10 years as necessary for a significant contribution.

  • Compressed gases are not attractive in view of their low fuel:weight ratio and should be regarded as an emergency energy source.

  • The use of electric power is well established for transport.  The problem of applying it to road vehicles is the energy storage system.  Considerable work has been done in developing alternative batteries but to date all leave the vehicle with restricted range.  Battery change seems the only feasible means of application to business vehicles and battery charge meters in the case of commuter vehicles.

    The fuel cell, when developed, will still be a light liquid fuel application hopefully with higher efficiency than the internal combustion engine.

  • Coal conversion technology is immediately available using the Fischer-Tropsch route as at SASOL.  Semi-production demonstration plants are in operation in U.S.A. using the hydrogenation route and significant work is in hand evaluating Australian coals for the purpose.  Long lead times are required to develop supply for significant contribution by either route.

    Flash pyrolysis of power house feed would require an increase of 25% in coal input and yield up to 15% of crude requirements of refineries.

    Lead times of 7-10, 10-15 and 5-7 years are likely for three alternatives quoted for coal conversion, viz:  SASOL, hydrogenation and pyrolysis.

    Wholesale coal conversion would reduce the virtually infinite reserves to something like a century with economically producible coals.

  • Shale kerogens are extensive, but largely in isolated areas.  Effective technology has yet to be developed for processing Australian shales.

The attached chart indicates the order of magnitude of the impact of the various alternative energy sources mentioned, together with the impact of application of known design variations of the vehicle engine and transmission system.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Acknowledgement is made to the considerable resource to data published in the report of the Task Force on Energy of the Institution of Engineers, Australia -- Towards an Energy Policy for Australia, 1977.

REFINERY CRUDE INPUT -- Bbl /DAY


LEGEND

The accompanying chart depicts the impact of the various alternatives discussed in the paper and the following explanation is given of the various terms involved.

RONRESEARCH OCTANE NUMBER is derived from the comparison of the anti-knock performance of the fuel in THE RESEARCH ENGINE compared with blends of standard reference fuel ISO-Octane (Octane number 100) and N-Heptane (Octane number 0).  The two research octane numbers quoted are current overseas and differ from the Australian values which are premium grade 98, standard grade 89.  The overseas values used have been quoted because relative data was available for them and similar effects would be expected with the Australian premium grade of 98 Octane number.
LPGLIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
LPG C3H8 refers to the grade of propane LPG obtain in stabilising crude or scrubbed from natural gas and distinct from refinery LPG which contains significantly large percentages of the unsaturated compound propylene C3H6 which has a very much lower RON rating than C3H8.
CH3OHMETHANOL prepared synthetically from natural gas or other hydrocarbons.  Heavy residual petroleum fuels can be readily used in the synthesis.
C2H5OHETHANOL may be prepared synthetically, but is usually prepared by fermentation of sugars and starches from renewable crop sources.  Can also be prepared from timber after severe hydrolysis prior to fermentation.
LPG + - OH'SRefers to the combined effects of maximum use of both METHANOL and ETHANOL and NATURAL LPG with engines retuned to suit particular fuel or blend of fuels being used.
HYBRIDRefers to a vehicle fitted for a petrol-driven generator operating in parallel with a bank of storage batteries supplying an electric motor drive to the car's transmission system.
DISC - ENGINEDIRECT INJECTION STRATIFIED CHARGE
This is a recent overseas development in which a very lean mixture is provided by normal carburation and at the time of firing a direct injection of fuel adjacent to the spark plug gives a local mixture sufficiently rich to be ignited by the spark which in turn acts as an ignitor for the very lean mix in the remainder of the charge.  This was developed initially as an attempt to achieve reduced exhaust emission, but has the added advantage of higher engine efficiency.
∞ GEAR BOXThe infinitely variable gear box is a mechanical device aimed at achieving an optimum matching of engine power road speed.  The device was used on a British bomber during World War II but fell into discard with the development of variable pitch airscrews.


TRANSPORT -- Alternative Energy Sources

The basic problem faced by Australia is the depletion of our indigenous supplies of crude petroleum and the maintenance of the transport function of the nation.  Other applications of liquid fuel can be satisfactorily met from either natural gas or coal.  Choice depends on the scale and location of the particular fuel user.  In the case of chemical feedstock, the choice may be decided on the needs of the particular chemical being produced.

In the national interest, the use of liquid fuel in stationary equipment should be minimised and fuel users should be encouraged to change to a plentiful indigneous fuel whenever new equipment is being specified and to convert existing equipment wherever this is practicable.

For transport, the only satisfactory fuel is one which will be readily stored and handled in the ordinary course of trade;  which will be stable in storage;  have a high carrying capacity and be capable of meeting a wide range of power demands in the vehicle on the road.

Currently, road transport is virtually restricted to either automotive distillate in high use vehicles or petrol in intermittent use vehicles.  These are materials with very specific properties and engines have been designed to make optimum use of their properties.

In view of the limited known crude petroleum reserves, alternative sources of energy for transport must be sought and it is first necessary to establish options available for this purpose. These are:

  1. To balance the VFR SYSTEM (vehicle, fuel and refinery operation) in such a fashion as to maximise the use of the barrel of crude for transport.
  2. The use of Natural LPG.
  3. Blending with Methyl fuel, Methanol or Ethanol.
  4. The use of compressed gases.
  5. Electrical.
  6. Coal Conversion.
  7. Shale Kerogens.

Not only is petroleum an energy source, but it must always be borne in mind that being hydrocarbon it is a chemical and it is possible that the value of the substance as a molecule may greatly exceed its convenience as a transport fuel.


  1. REFINING OPERATIONS

    Indications are that the motor spirit produced in Australia is probably approaching the optimum from the point of view of vehicle kilometres per litre.  The matter of converting the greatest proportion of the barrel of crude to transport fuel does leave some area for improvement and refineries are gearing up for this purpose as the proportion of imported crude increases.

    It is not possible to view the refinery in isolation from vehicle design and from emission standards.  It may be that there will have to be some revision of the emission standards and one basis which has merit would be to base the approval of engine design on the quantity of pollutant emitted, rather than on concentration.

    Thus a vehicle with a 1000 cc engine may be approved with no special emission control equipment, because of the small total quantity of exhaust gases which it generates, whereas a five litre vehicle may be forced to fit a full range of control equipment in order to reduce its emission of pollutants to the same quantity in grams or milligrams per hour.

    This notably affects hydrocarbon and CO in the case of petrol vehicles.  The diesel engine is much less susceptible in the matter of CO, but has a problem of aldehyde and soot emission.  The latter being very visible makes maintenance and control of the diesel engine much more likely than the petrol engine where all the pollutants are invisible to the naked eye.  Again there is the question of lead emission from petrol engines and this has an impact in the refinery as well as in the design of the motor.  Special valve seats may be required in the event of a completely lead-free fuel.  Both classes of engine have NOX emission (nitrogen oxides) as a problem.


  2. LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS - L.P.G.

    In the preparation of crude petroleum, a large proportion of L.P.G. is prepared automatically.  Similarly in Natural Gas a considerable amount of L.P.G. is present which can be separated from the dry gas without much difficulty.  Currently some 1,000,000 tonnes is exported each year.

    This material is admirably suited to urban fleet transport use.  It has the drawback of requiring pressure vessel storage and low relative density so giving limited vehicle range but ample for urban work.  It can be used at higher compression ratios than the normal motor vehicle -- up to 11:1 -- because of its high octane number of 120.  Refinery L.P.G. does not have such a good rating because of the presence of olefines.  Butane is also not as good but can be used satisfactorily in existing vehicle engines.  Cost of conversion of an existing petrol vehicle to L.P.G. is quite high, in the order of $500.  However, if initially fitted, as a fleet vehicle, the cost would be very little different from that of the standard petrol vehicle.

    A significant benefit from the use of LPG is the low pollution resulting.  Being a pressure storage situation there is no after evaporation, no crankcase dilution, much lower CO emission from exhaust gases and lower NOX and SO2 emission.  These are of great benefit in the urban environment.

    If used in diesel engines the substitution cannot be complete.  However, use of LPG supplement reduces considerably the problem of smoke emission under heavy load.

    From this it can be seen that maximum use should be made of primary LPG as a transport fuel, if necessary, with a tax incentive.

    Refinery LPG could be used if propylene is removed and used for polymer gasoline and polypropylene plastic.

    L.P.G. is produced as a joint product in liquefaction of natural gas.  Export of N.W. Shelf natural gas approved at present at 51% of reserves gives opportunity for L.P.G. extraction on the total reserve and liquefaction of the portion exported.  If this is done some 4,500 mill. tonnes of L.P.G. could be recovered or 2,300 mill. tonnes if only the export gas is processed.  This latter is equivalent to 2,500 mill. tonnes of motor spirit.

    Current export of L.P.G. of 1 mill. tonnes/year represents some 6% of total transport fuel or 10% motor spirit usage.  A further 50,000 tonnes per year could be extracted from the natural gas used in Sydney and Adelaide, but would require processing plants in the two centres because of transport problems from the Centre.


  3. METHANOL

    Another extender for petroleum in transport vehicles is methanol.  This can be prepared from a variety of feedstocks, from natural gas to coal.

    The basic process consists of gasifying the fuel to a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide and feeding the syngas at high pressure to a catalyst where reaction takes place.  The product is a mixture of alcohols but essentially methanol.  With minimum after processing the result is methyl fuel.  With careful separation, the chemical, methanol, can be prepared.

    Production units range up to 2,000 tonnes per day (80,000 bbl.).  This is obviously commensurate with oil refinery magnitude.  Methanol has been used as a single fuel but its properties are not such as to render it suitable for handling in our climate.  Its boiling point is only 62°C compared with petrol which has a wide boiling range from 30°-200°C.  Furthermore it is poisonous and results in blindness or death, if imbibed under the mistaken idea of its being "alcohol" -- but gasoline is also highly toxic.

    Its application is therefore as an extender of petrol.  The aromatic content of the petrol determines the miscibility of methanol in the mixture.  Thus premium grade with high aromatics, (25-30%), is completely miscible while standard grade with 10-12% aromatics will only accept 15-18% methanol.

    There is a further aspect to be kept in mind, viz:  water tolerance.  Too high a water content can lead to phase separation as water builds up in the tank due to absorption.  Of course, once this occurs satisfactory operation of the motor cannot be restored until the methanol-rich aqueous layer has been removed from the system.  This is important at temperatures around freezing.

    Bearing in mind these limitations, it is practicable to formulate methanol blends which have distinct advantages as well as extending the vehicle fuel base by 10% with reduced lead content to give the same vehicle performance as on premium petrol without any readjustment between fuels.  The advantages include cooler running and lower NOX and possible CO emission.

    Greater proportions of methanol in motor spirit require special tuning of the carburetter and spark.  If 30% methanol can be handled without problems of water separation, a lead-free motor spirit would be feasible.  However, there would be a drop in specific fuel consumption -- km/litre, as the heating value of methanol, being only half that of petrol, has reduced the heating value of the motor spirit more than the gain in thermal efficiency resulting from the use of methanol.

    The cost of pure methanol is quite high, but it is claimed that methyl fuel will have a similar cost to petroleum product on a heat content basis, being of a lower grade and hence lower cost than pure methanol.

    Investment cost of methanol plant varies considerably depending on the feedstock, natural gas being cheapest and coal being the dearest.  This, of course, raises the question of priority of application of natural gas deposits and the energy efficiency, in the order of 60%, of converting methane to methanol.


  4. ETHANOL AS AN AUTOMOTIVE FUEL

    Ethanol, the chemical name for Ethyl Alcohol, has been used as an extender for motor spirit in the past and is a possible future blend stock for current design automobile engines, up to 10% and possibly 15%, by volume.

    Although its heat content per gallon is only approximately two-thirds that of gasoline, it does have advantages in its high octane rating.  Up to 15% in the blend, ethanol causes no significant loss in engine performance because of the greater efficiency of combustion of setting the lower heat content.  Retuning of the engine is not compulsory and one may change from gasoline to ethanol blends and back without alteration to the engine.

    Currently the cost of ethanol is about double that of gasoline, in both cases before taxation.  Accordingly, any programme for ethanol extension of automotive fuel would depend either on considerations of national sufficiency, or on further significant rises in the price of crude oil.  Ethanol's big attraction lies in its being a renewable source of energy and is, in effect, a bio-conversion of solar energy to liquid fuel.

    Production from by-product molasses is an old industry in Australia, but present production is only about 80,000 tonnes per annum.  To supply 10% of Australia's estimated motor spirit requirements in 1985 would require two million tonnes of ethanol, approximately 25 times the present production capacity.  About half Australia's production of molasses is presently being used.

    In addition to sugar cane, other crops are suitable.  Cassava (tapioca) is the most promising, but wood wastes, or even special forests, can be used for the purpose.  Cost of ethanol from wood or wood waste is in the order of twice that from sugar or cassava.  In view of the renewable source, considerable interest is being shown in the potential of ethanol and Brazil has embarked on a strong government incentive scheme.

    Any source, whether it be sugar cane, cassava or timber, requires major agricultural operation and it has been estimated that some 10 years' development time would be required and an investment of the order of $2 billion, measured in 1977 prices, would be required.  Current cost of ethanol from molasses is about 30 cents per litre.  Estimated cost from cassava is 35 cents per litre, compared with motor spirit based on imported crude at about 16 cents per litre.

    The second important feature is the availability of land of suitable quality.  Sugar crops require best quality agricultural land and rainfall conditions and some half million hectares would be required to produce the 1985 figure of two million tonnes.  850,000 hectares would be required to produce the quantity needed from cassava, but the land quality could be much lower.  Eucalypt forests would require even greater areas of land and with the slow growth of timber this would be an annual clearing and re-forestation requirement rather than a total land use.  The total area required would depend on the life cycle of the timber chosen, but this is not likely to be less than 20 years, so some 20 million hectares would be required.

    Other aspects involved would be the need to ensure that the ethanol would, in fact, be used when it became available, otherwise investment on such a scale could not be contemplated.  If the present price differential continues between ethanol and petroleum products, price subsidies may also be necessary.  In addition, governmental support, both Federal and State, would be necessary during the longer development period.


  5. COMPRESSED GAS

    The quantities in Australia of natural gas in terms of energy are reported to be comparatively large (31 E.J. approximately).  Although the demand for natural gas will be strong, some of the domestic uses such as heating could be replaced by solar energy, and it may be desirable to divert some gas to transport, at least as a transitional energy source.  With an average energy content of about 39 megajoules per cubic metre, one standard "bottle" weighing 46 kgms would contain about the equivalent of 7½ ls of petrol.  Hydrogen is even worse with equivalence of only 2½ litres.

    This would add a considerable burden of weight to the small car but may be acceptable for other classes of vehicle.  Further study of the potential use of compressed natural gas in transport is desirable.


  6. ELECTRIC POWER

    The use of electricity to power transport has been well established for more than 50 years.  The main uses have been for urban transport in the form of tramways, trolley buses and suburban rail services.  Many of these have been displaced in recent years by oil fuelled buses and by increased use of the private car.  Battery operated vehicles using lead acid batteries have also been in use on a small scale for a long time.

    Some construction plant, such as excavators, have been powered by electricity where mobility has been restricted.

    The advantages of electrically operated vehicles are long life, low maintenance costs and absence of noise and pollution at the vehicle location.  Pollution will generally increase at the electricity generating location.  The main quoted disadvantage has been the restriction of mobility.

    So far, the energy level per unit of mobile weight for batteries cannot compete with the gas turbine and internal combustion engine in terms of efficiency, and is a constraint on the range of operation of battery powered vehicles.

    The lead acid battery, although economical at low power outputs, is so inefficient at high outputs, and so heavy, that its use is not likely to extend.  On the other hand, research into other types of battery has been active.

    The sodium sulphur battery has about five times the energy output for a given weight as the lead acid battery but is very expensive.  Because it operates at 350°C and because sodium reacts vigorously with water, it is said to be too dangerous for road vehicles.  It may be possible so to protect the battery that its use would become acceptable on the road.  Safer types of battery such as the Zinc Air Battery have not yet proven to be technically feasible.

    In the battery the electrodes are "consumed" while the electrolyte remains.  The reverse system, the fuel cell, is also a possible solution.  In this system the electrolyte conveys the fuel while the electrodes remain.  This has the advantage that fuel can be carried in some form of tank and fed to the cell.  Hydrogen is a suitable fuel but electrode life is short.  Further research into the fuel cell is necessary before it can be shown to be technically feasible, at least for transport use.

    It has been suggested (Ref. 4) that batteries could be charged using "off peak" power from existing power stations.  It is argued that because the capacity factor of generating plant is 45 per cent it would be possible to use the balance of generating capacity (55 per cent) for battery charging or for the production of hydrogen.  However, not all the installed plant is thermally fuelled.  About 30 per cent is hydro and its capacity factor cannot be increased due to the lack of fuel (i.e. water).  Further, not all of the remaining plant would be available.  The sum of forced and planned outages may be as high as 25 per cent and 100 per cent use of the off peak time is impossible due to marketing difficulties.  The average use of off peak power would be possible for only about 8 hours a day.  For these and other reasons, the available proportion of off peak energy may not be significant and would certainly be less than 10 per cent of present installed capacity.

    Research into battery cars is taking place at Flinders University (South Australia) and at the Tasmanian College of Advanced Education.  Many improvements are in development and it appears that it will be possible to obtain a range of about 50 miles both in urban and open road conditions using lead acid batteries.  The battery operated vehicle offers many attractive advantages over the internal combustion vehicle.  There are possibilities of very low mechanical maintenance, complete absence of gears, regenerative braking and non dependence on petroleum fuel with energy supply for storage in every home, office and plant.  In addition, there would be a great reduction in noise and an almost complete absence of pollution in urban areas, but increased pollution at the generating locations.

    Because of the limited range, battery powered passenger vehicles are unlikely to be accepted as other than a "second" vehicle by most households.  The potential voluntary substitution of electric power for liquid fuel consumption is therefore small, probably representing no more than 20 per cent of urban car travel, or a substitute for 5 per cent of total liquid fuel consumption.

    HYBRID VEHICLES -- As an intermediate stage and as a means of improving the range of electric vehicles, considerable work has been done overseas on the hybrid vehicle.  In this, a common arrangement is to have a small petrol engine driving an alternator at approximately constant speed and full load, charging a bank of batteries and operating while the vehicle is in motion as a parallel generator/battery supply to an electric motor supplying the car's transmission system.  Although not in commercial production, demonstration vehicles have been operated and show approximately twice the miles per gallon of an ordinary petrol vehicle, despite the additional weight necessary in the battery bank.  A petrol engine operating under these conditions can be tuned to optimum performance with regards, not only to mechanical performance, but also to minimising pollutant emissions.


  7. COAL CONVERSION

    Production of methanol from coal has been mentioned, however, synthetic petrol can be produced using different catalysts.  The Fischer Tropsch Syntheses are the only commercial systems currently available and being operated in Sasolburg, South Africa.

    Considerable work has been done on hydrogenation processes but to date none is on the commercial scale, although several large scale pilot plants are in operation for collection of design data on which to base commercial scale designs, processing in the order of 20,000-30,000 tons per day.

    The third source of liquid fuel from coal is pyrolysis.  The scheme is to carbonise, possibly in fluidised bed, the fuel normally used in power generation en route to the boiler furnace.  Some 30% of the coal is "volatile matter" and a potential source of liquid products.  The essential feature of liquid fuel is its much higher H/C ratio than in solid fuels and the virtual absence of oxygen compounds.

    FuelMass Ratio
    Total - H
    Hydrogen/Carbon
    Available - H
    Gasoline0.170.17
    Arabian Crude Oil0.150.145
    Brown Coal (Dry)0.070.015
    Bituminous Coals
      Oaklands
      Singleton
      Millmeran
      Galilee

    0.09
    0.105
    0.10
    0.10

    0.08
    0.10
    0.095
    0.09
    Pyrolysis (U.S.A)0.090.08 (coal at 0.055)
    Syncrude (Hydrogenated)0.1250.12

    In addition to its low hydrogen ratio, brown coal has a high oxygen content which is the reason for its very low available hydrogen shown above.

    Pyrolysis systems are represented by the C.O.E.D. which has been developed to the pilot plant stage operating at 36 tons/day.  The product is of such a quality that mild hydrogenation is needed for use as a refinery feedstock.

    General expected performance is as follows:

    PYROLYSIS SYSTEM

    Coal type and rank;High volatile bituminous
    Oil yields;1 bbl/ton on total;  ( >4 on incremental)** aromatic, high C/H ratio
    Gas yield;Small, mainly methane, but could be increased at expense of char
    Thermal Efficiency;65-70% to light products, on incremental coal
    Plant Size;30,000 bbl/day for 2000 MW station
    Plant Cost level;$250 MM, i.e. $8000 per daily bbl
    Product cost, coal at $15/ton$18/bbl
    Status;Extensive l½ ton/hr. pilot planting reported in detail
    Australian applicability;With power plant in Hunter Valley and S.E. Queensland.

    HYDROGENATION processes are essentially variants or developments from the Bergius process operated in Europe in the '30s and largely supplied the German war machine in World War II.

    The state of development is summarised as follows:

    HYDROGENATION

    COAL TYPE- High vitrinite, plus exinite, low ash;  low to medium rank are preferred.
    - Higher rank requires less hydrogen.
    OIL YIELD- < 3 bbl/ton;  aromatic high C/H ratio
    GAS YIELD- Small, use for hydrogen
    THERMAL EFFICIENCY- < 60-65% to light products
    PLANT SIZE- 30,000-100,000 bbl/day (10,000-30,000 ton coal)
    - (3,000-7,000 for commercial demonstration units)
    CAPITAL COST LEVEL- >$10,000 per daily barrel
    PRODUCT COST- (black coal at $15/ton) $20-$30 per bbl*
    STATUS- Extensive pilot planting, several processes the first of three commercial demonstration plants under construction, major contractors could offer a plant now.
    AUSTRALIAN APPLICABILITY- Victorian brown coal;  Hunter Valley and S.E. Queensland (Darling Downs) very suitable.

    * Published professional estimates show $10 to $12 per bbl, but current industry assessment is at the higher level.


    The cost of hydrogen generated from the coal and which is used in the further process to derive the product oil, represents some 50 per cent of the cost of the ultimate product oil and the system must be therefore highly selective as to the type of coal which can be used.  Vitrinite is the constituent that is most volatile in coal and is used to identify coal type.  The carbon content of Vitrinite is used to describe the coal ranking.  When these two items are plotted against each other it becomes very clear how extremely limited are the coals from our total coal reserves, which are really best suited to conversion to oil.  With this in mind consideration should be given to dedicating the appropriate coal reserves now for conversion to oil at a later date.

    The scale of operation needed for present day peacetime conditions is larger by an order of magnitude (i.e. ten times greater) than previously operated and this will involve significant commissioning problems

    High pressure hydrogen-pyrolysis has also been proposed and the Coalcon process is under negotiation for the construction of a demonstration plant of 100 ton per day capacity.  It is intermediate betweeen the pyrolysis and hydrogenation processes with claimed yields of light crude of 1½ barrels per ton.  It yields about half the heating value of the coal feed as high methane gas.  Little detail has been published on this process.

    SYNTHESIS is the process wherein the coal is first gasified and then purified prior to entering the synthesis stage of the Fischer-Tropsch process.  As mentioned earlier this is the only process currently operating on the commercial scale in the world.  The SASOL plant is currently being extended to some 30,000 bbl/day.  The process produces a wide spectrum of products all of which must find application to ensure economical operation.

    Two types of unit are in use.  One using the fixed bed catalyst produces motor spirit of low octane rating but at the same time produces acceptable diesel fuel.  The fluidised bed unit produces motor spirit similar in properties to petroleum based products.

    The large proportion of gas generated makes access to a large complex essential for the thermal efficiency and economics of the process.

    The Lurgi fixed bed gasifier is the only unit currently operating in the process train.  However, several developments are in hand in Europe and America aimed at handling fine coal and slurries.  These should result in significantly lowering costs quoted in the following summary:

    SYNTHESIS SYSTEM

    COAL- Any material except strongly coking coals, high volatile coal is advantageous
    OIL YIELD- < 1¼ bbl/ton -- gives high quality products but gasoline has a low "knock" rating.
    GAS YIELD- 10%, much higher possible
    THERMAL EFFICIENCY- < 50% if by-products and gas are cycled.
    PLANT SIZE- SASOL II at 30,000 bbl/day
    COST LEVEL- >$1500 MM;  $60,000/daily barrel*
    PRODUCT COST- coal at $10, >$30 per bbl * +.
    STATUS- Well proved commercial
    AUSTRALIAN APPLICATION- Is a promising future method for production of gas and oil (in-situ gasification may reduce costs)*

    To gain perspective, if it were decided to produce the same amount of syncrude -- the term used to describe the refinery feedstock from coal conversion -- as the 1976 actual production of crude petroleum in Australia, the following coal usage would result.

    SystemYield/tonneCoal
    M tonne
    Pyrolysis *1 bbl
    4 bbl
    245
    61
    Synthesis1¼ bbl196
    Hydrogenation1½ bbl
    2½ bbl
    163
    98

    * Plant capacity must be sized on the total coal throughput on which the yield is 1 bbl/tonne.  However, if all the fuel for a power house were carbonised the coal requirements are increased by a third and yield on incremental coal is 4 bbl/tonne.


    Stated another way, the excess of crude required to the year 2000 over and above presently known petroleum reserves amounts to:

          6,200 mill bbl @ 1½% exponential increase
    or 12,700 mill bbl (@) 5%

    If these quantities were produced for black coal, present reserves of 20,000 M-tonnes would be depleted by the following amounts:

    SystemCoal Usage M-tonnes
    (1½% Exp.)
    Growth
    (5% Exp.)
    Growth
    Pyrolysis6,200 (31%)12,700 (63%)
    Synthesis4,950 (25%)10,200 (51%)
    Hydrogenation
      @ 1½ bbl
      @ 2½ bbl

    4,150 (21%)
    2,500 (12½%)

    8,500 (42½%)
    5,100 (25½%)

    Usage for other purposes is estimated at some 1300 M-tonnes and export of approximately the same amount.

    Thus, pyrolysis would be patently unable to handle the quantity needed because of the absence of a user for the char.

    However, there is a good case for processing all the feed to central power generating stations thereby contributing some 1000 million bbl of syncrude or about a sixth of crude requirements over the period if the plant were ready to operate immediately.


  8. OIL SHALE

    Kerogens in oil shale are a large potential source of liquid fuels.

    Deposits considerably exceed the known crude petroleum deposits, but are largely located in remote areas.

    They present the same problems of scale of operation as does coal conversion.  Oil yield is in the vicinity of ½-1 bbl/tonne and to supply the current crude production of 350,000-400,000 bbl/day would require some 400,000-500,000 tonnes of shale per day.

    Refinery practice would also require modification to accommodate the different composition of the kerogen crude.

    Both of these developments would take some years to put into effect and in any case depend on the availability and price of crude petroleum.  Economics currently are not favourable, but do not appear any less favourable than coal conversion.

    Technology still requires development for processing Australian shales, so once again the question of lead time intrudes.

    This is the nub of the whole question of alternative energy sources for transport fuels.

    Of all the alternatives only L.P.G. is currently available in significant quantities and then only if export contracts are abrogated.

    Technology is current for L.P.G. extraction from natural gas, for methanol and ethanol production.

    Lead times for L.P.G. and methanol would be some 3-4 years after committing the project, without major labour and weather holdups.  Ethanol is the only renewable source and would require significant crop development as well as personnel and other infrastructure deployment.



AUSTRALIAN INDIGENOUS FUEL RESOURCES
FUTURE PETROLEUM SUPPLY/DEMAND

SITUATION

  1. Domestic Production

    Esso-B.H.P. have recently announced upgraded reserve figures for the Bass St. fields, as a result of further drilling, the re-evaluation of reservoir conditions and import parity prices for an increasing portion of production.  The revised figures, which lift total reserves and remaining recoverable reserves by 15.0% and 23.9% respectively, have important implications for Australia's future rate of indigenous crude production.  The higher oil prices, as per the Government's guidelines, also seem likely to release reserves in previously uneconomic Bass Strait fields, notably Cobia and West Kingfish, which together are estimated to contain 300 mm.bbls.  However, these have been excluded from the projections of domestic crude production.

    These factors, together with a lessening of the rate of decline in production from Australia's other major producing area, Barrow Island, because of the secondary recovery techniques possible under higher well-head prices, will move the peak in Australia crude production several years more into the future than before.  Thus, the decline in domestic production should commence around about 1982/83 rather than 1979/80 as previously anticipated.  The projected figures are largely Esso-B.H.P. estimates modified by the recent pricing and reserve information.


  2. CONSUMPTION

    Total consumption of petroleum products in Australia grew at an average rate of 3.6% between 1969 and 1976, despite two years of static demand in 1975 and 1976.  For the five years prior to 1975, the growth rate averaged 5.2%

    The rate of growth in world wide petroleum consumption has slowed significantly since the 1974/5 recession and more importantly, the quadrupling of world oil prices by OPEC.  A number of reliable sources are now suggesting 3.5% p.a. or thereabouts as a likely future rate of growth in world petroleum consumption.  Australia seems likely to slightly better this rate, both because of its lower oil prices relative to most of the industrialised world and the greater portion of petroleum consumption related to transportation.  A rate of 4.0% p.a. has been used as a likely future growth rate for Australian oil consumption.  This ties in quite well with a number of estimates from knowledgeable sources including Esso, the Royal Commission on Petroleum and the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.


  3. PETROLEUM PRICES

    With the advent of large scale crude production from Alaska and the North Sea, together with the leisurely pace of world economic recovery, OPEC countries have experienced difficulties in lifting their production rates from the reduced levels that prevailed during the recession.  However, despite the much publicised current world surplus of petroleum products, this phase is not expected to persist more than one or two years.  After this time, the major new non-OPEC sources of supply will be nearing peak production levels and further expansion in demand will have to be satisfied from largely OPEC sources.  Thus, it can be expected that OPEC will again attempt to maximise petroleum prices, subject to economic considerations, and attempt to not only keep up with rates of inflation but also achieve real growth in oil prices.  If done at a modest pace, this will inhibit excessive usage of liquid hydrocarbons in the Western industrialised countries, lessen the rate of depletion of OPEC's in-ground reserves and enable higher real growth in the economies and standards of living of OPEC member countries.  For the purposes of this compilation, real growth in oil prices is assumed to average 4% p.a.

    Australian crude oil will be priced according to the recently formulated Government guidelines until 1980/81.  Full import parity should be achieved by around 1985.  The Government's pricing policy allows the first six mm.bbls p.a. or a proportion of total production from each producing field to be sold at import parity prices.  The proportion saleable at import parity increases from 10% in 1977/8, to 20% in 1978/9, 35% in 1979/80 and 50% in 1980/81.  At that date, the policy will be reviewed.  For this study, it has been assumed that parity prices will be achieved by 1985 via a 10% p.a. increase in the import parity portion of production in 1981/82 and 1982/83 and 15% p.a. increases in 1983/84 and 1984/85.

    Based on the above inputs, a weighted average price of Australian indigenous crude has been formulated and thence a somewhat simplistic value for average retail petrol prices derived, purely as an indication of the type of price the man in the street may be paying during the period examined.  The derived retail petrol prices assumes no real growth in Government excise, transport or refining costs and so on.


  4. OTHER SUPPORTIVE INFORMATION

    The production, consumption and pricing projections derived for the period 1977-1990 are based on the subject matter discussed above as well as a number of simplifying assumptions.  The more important of these include:

    1. All monetary values are in 1977 dollars.  Inflation is not built into the projections.

    2. It is assumed that no major oil discoveries are made and developed within the period under review.  Current uneconomic fields in Bass Strait, are also excluded from production estimates because of the uncertainties connected with them, particularly as to reserves and timing of development.

    3. Australia currently exports a significant portion of its petroleum production, particularly LPG and, as in the past, these exported hydrocarbons are replaced in the domestic market by an equal amount of imported products (over and above that required to satisfy the domestic petroleum deficit) generally in a more useful form or a more convenient location market wise.  Thus, petroleum exports do not have a net effect on the consumption/production/import equations derived and have therefore been ignored.

    4. It is assumed that on a world wide basis, sufficient crude will be available to consumers to meet their needs and that a runaway pricing situation will not occur as a result of a continuing shortage of petroleum products at some stage.  This basically implies a willingness by OPEC producers to gradually lift their production rates in line with world demand, with compensation for the ever-increasing rate of depletion of their reserves via the 4% p.a. real growth in crude prices.

    5. The figures derived, particularly for petroleum consumption, are obviously artificial in terms of their consistent growth rates.  They essentially are no more than indicators of likely supply, demand and price levels at any future point in time and as in the past, economic conditions and a wide range of other parameters will produce fluctuations around the trendlines represented by the calculated values.

    6. Consumption figures are based on an approximate continuation of current trends.  In other words, historical rates of consumption modified by recent changes in long term economic thought, current consumption trends and the likely effect of higher prices, have been used.  Dramatic changes in Government policy, prices or other factors, could significantly alter consumption trends, reducing rates of growth well below the reduced rates already used in this study.

      However, pending evidence of the potential success of any such measures, and given that the supply/demand figures are intended as a guide to the probable future situation given a continuance of current trends, no allowance has been made for more extreme measures.

    7. The $US/$A exchange rate is assumed to be constant at $US1.10/$A for the duration of the period.



AUSTRALIAN PETROLEUM SUPPLY/
DEMAND/PRICE PROJECTIONS

197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
ConsumptionBBL's {219228237246256266277288300312324337351365379
Indigenous Prod.1531611611601601591581531311139591806663
Imports6667768696107119135169199229246271299316
% of Total Consumption30.029.432.135.037.540.243.046.956.363.870.773.077.281.983.4
World Oil Price $US/bbl11.5112.6913.2013.7314.2714.8515.4416.0616.7017.3718.0618.7819.5420.3221.13
Cost of Imports $Am691773912107412451445167019712565314337604200481455246070
Weighted Average Price of Crude
in Aust. $A/bbl (incl. Govt. Levy)
6.187.048.389.6711.0711.7212.6714.0515.1116.4016.9117.5218.1418.7819.49
Approximate Retail
Petrol Price ¢/ litre
151821242829323538414244454749

What's wrong with Socialism?

I. THE LIGHT THAT FAILED

The workings of Socialism have been shocking and surprising -- especially to Socialists.

Most Socialists were well-meaning people.  Their theories may not have held water, but their hearts were in the right place.  They sincerely believed that Socialism would mean the end of "oppression", the opening of a new era of individual freedom and prosperity, and the permanent attainment of world peace.

They were persuaded of their own theory, and they persuaded other people.  Theories often look plausible when their advocates concentrate upon the abuses which they would eliminate, and conveniently ignore the new abuses which they would cause.

But the real test of a theory is the way it works out in practice.  The proof of the pudding is in the eating.  And Socialism in practice has turned out to be very different from Socialism in theory.

In Russia, the Socialists gained complete control, and destroyed all the institutions which Socialists everywhere denounce.  The result -- the completest and vilest dictatorship in human history.

In Italy, the Corporate Socialists (Fascists) achieved a partial dictatorship, which, under the influence of its more powerful neighbour, Germany, adventured for world conquest.

In Germany, the woolly-minded Weimar Socialists prepared the way for the National Socialists (Nazis), second only to the Soviet in totalitarianism, and bent upon subjecting the whole world to their system.

Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler -- these are not just imaginary creatures of theory;  they represent Socialism in Action, which is something very different from the desires of the Socialist theorists.  It was not the Socialists' desires which were at fault -- rather the trouble lay in the unforseen consequences of the application of their well-meant but misguided policy.

Indeed, honest Socialists are appalled at the outcome;  and in self-defence they cry "This is not Socialism".  It is certainly not what the Socialists intended;  but equally certainly it is what happened after Socialists got control.  The Socialist, too proud to admit that there is anything wrong with his basic idea, endeavours to attribute these Socialist disasters, not to the nature of the idea, but to the accidents of unworthy ambition and lust for power.  The Socialist cannot, however, suggest any way of avoiding these "accidents";  he can only deplore them in retrospect.


DISILLUSION

Socialist disillusion often takes the form of denying that movements are "Socialist" after they reach a certain stage in their development.  In Italy and Germany this stage was fairly clearly marked by the seizure of power by the Dictator -- though even after that there were Socialists who paid half-reluctant tribute to the "full-employment" and "social services" policy of Hitler and Mussolini.

With regard to Russia, there was no such clear-cut line of demarcation, because the dictatorship was inherent in the original Socialist set-up;  and Socialists tended to judge the regime from the way in which the Soviet system developed.  The manner of its development was different even from the desires of the original Russian Socialists;  so that opposition appeared even in Russia.  But this opposition was quickly and physically liquidated as "Trotskyist", and the Soviet dictatorship proceeded upon its destined way.

Concurrently with the liquidation of these "Trotskyists", overseas Socialists began to lose faith in Russia.  Genuine Communists renounced their allegiance and joined the Labour Parties;  and gradually the various Labour Parties were forced to abandon their pro-Soviet outlook.  But they still called themselves "Socialist" -- and they justified their attitude by asserting that Russia had deserted Socialism.  To some extent, their obscure realisation that the Soviet disaster stemmed from the very nature of Socialism made them all the less rational in their reactions.

Because, whatever they said to themselves, they could not deny that, in proportion as a country aimed to become Socialist, in that same proportion it became totalitarian.  Russia was the supreme example;  but the failures and confusions of the European Socialist regimes, which finally had to abandon their attempt to co-operate with Russia, could not be disregarded.  Even in countries such as Britain and Australia there were ominous signs;  it was becoming clear that industrial conscription was an essential part of a Socialist State.  Nor could Socialists ignore the fact that it was from the Socialist Soviet that the chief threat to world peace was coming.


CONFUSION

The Socialists, then, have been thrown into confusion and bitterness by the failure of Socialism.  They started out with good intentions -- but their good intentions were not enough.  And since the Socialist organisations -- such as the Labour Party -- are still powerful forces, it is important to analyse just why it is that Socialism is breaking down.  It is only by becoming clear upon this point that we can hope to save ourselves from a Socialist disaster.

Socialists work for the public ownership and control of the means of production, distribution and exchange.  They assert that all economic activity should be carried out in the interests of the State.  They demand that the State should take over, more and more, the rights and duties which were considered the prerogative of the individual.  At first sight these propositions look harmless and attractive enough.  And yet -- the fact remains that the attempt to implement them seems always to end in disaster.

Why is it, then, that Socialism always develops into totalitarianism?  What goes wrong?  Why do the people who want to create a heaven upon earth end up by creating a Communist or Nazi slave-state?  How is it that their peaceful intentions finally forge the instrument of world aggression?

Behind this degeneration of Socialism there are many factors at work;  most of them can be classified under two heads: --

  • Factors Affecting Production.
  • Factors of Authority.

An understanding of the way these factors work will enable us to answer the question:  "What's wrong with Socialism?"



II. SOCIALISM JUST CAN'T DELIVER THE GOODS

Socialist production is inefficient.  That is why standards of living are so low under Socialism.

Russia, of course, is the best example of this;  Socialism has been established there for 30 years, and during that time Soviet living standards have been the lowest of any white race.  The Russian productive system, in spite of its immense resources of raxv materials and its access to British and American techniques, has not achieved the output necessary to maintain its own people.

Socialist experiments in Europe have resulted in rationing and run-away prices, both evidences of inadequate output.  In Britain, the recovery after the War has been very disappointing -- and for this the policy of the Socialist Government is largely (though not, of course, entirely) to blame.

The history of nationalised industries provides further evidence of the failure of Socialism.  State-owned concerns can rarely hold their own in fair competition with free enterprise;  unless protected by monopoly or some other unfair advantage, they are regular money-losers.

The "fully-planned economy" may look attractive enough on paper;  there are three main reasons for its breakdown in practice: --

  • The inflexibility of centralised Socialist plans.
  • The progressive corruption of the Socialist bureaucracy.
  • The removal of incentive.

INFLEXIBILITY

By this time most people know, from personal experience, the meaning of "Red Tape".  There are few of us who have not chafed, sometime or other, at the losses and delays caused by "Regulations".  And yet -- if we are fair-minded -- we must admit that the Public Servants, who administer these regulations, are generally doing their best, and are trying to be helpful in so far as the regulations allow.  In most cases, too, they are by no means incompetent.  Even the regulations themselves are not unreasonably drafted in the great majority of cases.

The fault, then, does not lie so much in the particular nature of the regulations or their administration;  rather it lies in the attempt to apply regulations to circumstances which do not admit of being successfully dealt with by such a system at all.

A Socialist system is centralised and fully planned.  It has regulations for everything, because Socialism subjects all production to its own "plan".  It endeavours to abolish all the ordinary economic controls, which leaves its own authoritarian controls as the only alternative to anarchy.

Consumer-choice dwindles -- your power of spending your money as you like is curtailed by ration-books and coupons.  The producer hasn't got to worry about producing an article to meet the consumer's taste -- all he has to do is to produce an article to meet what the bureaucrat (who decides these things) thinks the consumer's task ought to be.

Instead of being served at the counter, you wait in the Socialist queue;  and the time wasted in waiting is lost so far as work or enjoyment is concerned.  Thus production and living standards fall;  continued exasperation leads to hopeless frustration;  and the morale of all life suffers another setback.  Regulations become fiercer as Socialism develops.  Without regulations, there can be no Socialism.

But, against the changing and unforeseeable circumstances of life, regulations sometimes cut a very poor figure.  The State's attempt to plan completely every detail of the way you should run your farm or shop, or your job, ends up by making it impossible for you to run them efficiently.  Only personal judgment and initiative will enable you to meet your own personal problems effectively -- and Socialism leaves no room for your personal judgment and initiative.

Think of the conscientious Public Servant behind the counter, saying "I know it may not seem very sensible in this case;  but it's what the regulations say, and we've got to follow the regulations."  That is the fate of every producer -- under Socialism.

No wonder Socialist industry is inefficient.


CORRUPTION

Most Public Servants are honest.  The Public Service has a fine tradition, and its functions, until recently, have been pretty much routine.  Routine functions do not offer any great temptations.

Under Socialism, however, the Public Service performs many functions which are not of a routine nature.  Such functions make the Public Servant the real arbiter of advantage, and therefore do offer considerable temptations.

In recent years, some of these non-routine Socialist functions have already become part of our administrative system.  Prices control, import permits, land sales control, timber monopolies, road transport licenses, petrol priorities and things of that character are examples.  In relation to these, corruption is inevitable under Socialism.  It may be monetary corruption, it may be mere political patronage.  The crop of scandals which are coming to light are not just accidental -- they are a necessary and inherent part of Socialism in Action.

Nor need we flatter ourselves that these abuses are confined to politicians and Public Servants.  The corrupting influence of the Socialist way of life reaches to all sections of the community.  When regulations reach everywhere, there are few of us who can boast that we have never broken any of them.  The borrowing of a petrol ticket, the obtaining of a couponless cut of meat, the payment of a few pence above the legal price -- all may seem small matters to the individual, but in sum total they add up to the Black Market.  And the Black Market is no small matter -- it is another essential feature of Socialism in Action.

Corruption, carried to its inevitable conclusion, helps further to reduce Socialist production;  and is part of the reason for the collapse of living standards under Socialism.

No wonder Labour Governments fear inquiry into the personal activities of their members and officials.


LACK OF INCENTIVE

Socialism reduces incentive.  It demands that everyone should work for the State, not for himself -- and, under these circumstances, people lose keenness.

Socialism involves high taxation, which is necessary to pay for the administrative top-hamper of a Socialist system.  High taxation reduces incentive still further.

Even in the first stages of the introduction of Socialism the blighting effect is seen.  The employer or the man working on his own account will not take the risk of a new venture;  for (he says) "If I lose, I carry the loss myself;  if I win, the State takes the winnings."  Thus Socialist stagnation replaces enterprise;  industry falls to progress;  and the standard of living is destroyed.

The first phase of Socialism is largely responsible for the tragedy of British production since the war.  But even this first phase is not so bad as the second phase -- where no new enterprise or change in method of production can take place except upon the initiative of a Civil Servant.  Britain has not reached this stage yet -- the Russian example shows what it involves.

The effects of Socialism upon employees are just as disastrous as upon employers.  They lose their prospect of independence, their prospect of bettering themselves by their own efforts.  Taxation reduces their earnings, and austerity limits their range of choice of the things they can buy with the remainder.  Having little to work for, they are not keen to work at all.

The consequent industrial malaise -- obstructionism, go-slow, the darg -- strangles production.  A very real sense of frustration and exhaustion seems to affect everybody as soon as incentive is removed.  This exhaustion is not imaginary -- bludging can be very hard work, as anyone who has had any experience of the Army Fatigue system can testify.

On an Army Fatigue everything follows regulations, and everybody tries to find a way of dodging work.  At the end of the day, very little has been done, and yet nearly everybody feels really tired.

Socialism puts all production on the footing of an Army Fatigue -- no wonder so little work gets done.


THE SOCIALIST'S REMEDY

The Socialist is thus faced with a very unpleasant problem.  As a consequence of the introduction of his system, production starts to fall.  Rationing becomes progressively more necessary;  shortages develop into bottlenecks;  standards of living decline;  he is caught in a vicious spiral of austerity;  chaos is only just around the corner.

Desperately he searches for a final expedient -- something that will prevent the collapse of his intensifying regulation system.  He needs something to take the place of incentive, and he finds it -- in manpower control.


INDUSTRIAL CONSCRIPTION

Industrial conscription is an essential part of Socialism -- it is the only thing which will make Socialism work.  Lenin recognised this in April, 1917, when he said --

"Universal Labour Service is something new, something that constitutes part of a Socialist whole -- this is often overlooked by those who fear to face present conditions frankly." (1)

Manpower control, industrial conscription, universal labour service (they are all merely different names for the same thing), emerging as a necessary consequence of Socialism, forms a significant part of the mechanism whereby the Socialist Utopia becomes a Totalitarian State.

The well-meaning Socialists do not at first mean to introduce this measure.  It is forced upon them, however, as an unwanted consequence of their own policy.  By that time, they have already reduced the nation to such straits that the new servitude is accepted as a "patriotic duty".  It is put forward (like so many other measures were originally put forward) as a "temporary expedient".  It is called "the only alternative to starvation" -- and indeed Socialism has already made such in-roads upon production that this is very near the truth.  Because the nation did not understand the implications of the Socialist policy in time, it is forced to acquiesce in the direction of labour which is its inevitable result.

That is what is happening in Britain to-day, where a Socialist Government has just re-introduced industrial conscription in peace-time.  So far, it is only the thin end of the wedge;  but unless the Socialist trend is reversed even Britain will, in time, become fully totalitarian.  Without industrial conscription, there can be no Socialism.

That is how the factors affecting production operate to turn Socialism into Totalitarianism, quite contrary to the original desires of well-meaning Socialists.



III. VACANCY -- FOR DICTATOR

Socialism involves the concentration of all economic power into a single system.  Full socialism means the setting up of a monopoly far more watertight than any of the monopolies which Socialists denounce.

But Socialism goes much further than this.  It involves also the integration of economic and political power -- to put it colloquially, it makes the Boss and the Policeman the same person.  No private monopoly has ever had one-tenth of the power over its employees and customers that a Socialist monopoly wields.  And since the real evil of a monopoly lies in its power, a State monopoly is the worst of all monopolies.

The success of the British constitutional system over the last few centuries has depended to a great extent upon the decentralisation of authority.  Legislative, executive, judicial and economic powers have been kept largely separate.  Socialism wipes away all this careful decentralisation, and amalgamates all power.  It thus destroys the whole basis of the British way of life, and renders the maintenance of British liberty impossible.

Socialists may say "The concentration of power does not matter, because it is concentrated in the hands of the nation."  But, of course, it is not concentrated in the hands of the nation -- it is concentrated in the hands of the Government.  And there is no guarantee that the Government will carry out the nation's wishes;  there is no guarantee that it will not use the power entrusted to it for its own ends -- which may not be the nation's ends.

"But" our simple-minded Socialist may say, "if a Government exceeds its mandate it can always be dealt with at the next Election."  He may ignore the possibility of vital and irrevocable changes ("you can't unscramble eggs") -- but dare he ignore the possibility of a Government using its power to falsify the next Elections?  Hitler and Stalin had no need to fear the ballot-box while they controlled the electoral machinery;  and only in the last few months the system of rigged elections has been extended to Poland, Rumania, Yugoslavia and Bulgaria.  "It can't happen here," our Socialist may weakly exclaim -- until he remembers, perhaps, the sliding ballot-box panels and other electoral pressures and frauds which have characterised elections inside certain Socialist Trades Unions in Australia -- until he remembers, perhaps, the discussions on the re-distribution of seats and the deliberate rigging of the Electorates which are going on at present in the Australian Labour Caucus at Canberra.


"SOCIALIST COMPETITION"

Socialism does not eliminate competition.  It merely transfers competition from the economic field to the far more deadly field of State authority.  Economics can affect a man's livelihood, but State authority controls both his livelihood and his life.  Those Socialists who denounce "the evils of economic competition" might do well to consider the fine "non-competitive" nature of an Election, or the fine "non-competitive" debates in the House!

There is only one way to eliminate competition from political life -- and that is to put everything in the hands of the Dictator.  And in fact, under Socialism, the bitterness and corruption of political life become so intolerable that people are inclined to accept a Dictator almost with relief.  And this, too, is part of the mechanism by which Socialism degenerates into totalitarianism.

Socialist corruption finally expresses itself in terms of power -- which is far more terrible than the mere money-corruption of Socialism's early stages.  The early stages may seem bad enough when a Socialist politician has the power to enrich himself by ruining you -- but it is far worse in the later stages, when he can have you "directed to labour" or imprisoned or executed for political reasons.

Perhaps those who recall some of the corruption associated with wartime manpower control will have some idea of the possible line of development.  In Britain and Australia, of course, it never went beyond the early stages.  But the people of the Balkans, subjected to-day to the continuous process of Stalinist terror, are to-day experiencing Socialist corruption in a highly developed form, involving political imprisonment and political murder.  (This may seem highly-coloured and far-fetched the first time you read it -- but, remember, it is actually happening.)


THE DILEMMA OF AUTHORITY

So long as men are ambitious -- so long as the men who rise to the top in politics are ambitious -- the concentration of power must open the door to abuses;  and the total concentration of all power, political and economic, into a single Socialist network opens the door to the Dictator.  Power obtained on one pretext is used for another purpose -- used to perpetuate itself.  This dilemma of authority is the central fact of European and world history in this century.

Theory shows what is likely to happen;  practice shows what does happen.  Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin -- these are not mere theoretical figures of the imagination.  They are portents -- but they are part of reality.  Each one of them founded his dictatorship upon Socialism.  Each one of them concentrated power "in the hands of the nation" -- and made himself the nation's hands.

The dictatorship in each case came about by the destruction of all competing authority and the integration of all authority in accordance with one "plan".  The tactics of Stalin and Hitler followed the lines marked out for them by other "men of the people" who have made themselves tyrants.  All potential dictators have to face up to the elimination of their rivals -- the pattern is constant.  The "Cutting down of the tall Poppies" over 2000 years ago is repeated in Hitler's "Night of the Long Knives" or Stalin's "Purges".  We have not yet reached this stage in Britain or Australia, but Socialists, with their doctrine of the class-war, are already busy stirring up the preliminary bitterness -- unconsciously clearing the Dictator's path.

Just as most Socialists start by meaning well, so most Dictators start by believing that they will be benevolent.  They feel that they have a "mission" -- and that justifies anything.  Even when they are following the own interests, they salve their consciences by reflecting that "their interests are the same as the nation's".

The first stages of this moral deterioration are already apparent in the conduct of Labour leaders after they have been a certain time in office.  They quite blatantly act in the interests of the "Labour movement" rather than in the interests of the nation, and quite openly boast that, since they have been given the power, they no longer need a specific mandate for far-reaching and irrevocable Socialist moves.  An examination of the developing conduct and character of these Labour leaders shows that there is plenty of dictator-talent among British and Australian Socialists.


SOCIALISM WILL ALWAYS PRODUCE ITS DICTATORS

But, basically, it does not matter whether the forces originally responsible for the Socialistic concentration of power succeed in keeping their grasp upon it -- whatever happens, the final result will be much the same.  The original Socialist may be clever enough to seize the concentrated power for himself or his Party's nominee -- or he may only be an innocent catspaw for a more sinister figure lurking in the background.  Completed Socialism will certainly produce its dictator.  The Kremlin (which, viewed from the back, is only the same as the Brown House) stands at the end of the Socialisation road.

Nor does it matter under what slogan the power-concentration is effected -- because, of course, it is always done under the fairest of all slogans.  "Power for the people" -- but once weld all power into a single system, so that it can be controlled by a single person, once create the sensitive pressure-points, and how easily it transmutes itself into "Power over the people".


TRUST BETRAYED

The history of Socialism has always been and must always be the history of trust betrayed.  Men claim power to end an abuse, and exercise it to create one.  Democracy can only be destroyed in the name of democracy.

The Socialist system conditions people to regulations, so that they accept with lessening protest each new invasion of their liberty.  Finally, they are called upon to accept even industrial conscription as the price of survival.  The centralisation of all power creates the opportunity -- first for the dictatorship of a Party and then for the dictatorship of an individual.  Once the process is started, it is difficult to stop -- it can only be stopped by a conscious effort, based upon an insight into what is happening.

The history of Socialism in Germany was not merely a historical accident -- it sprang from the nature of Socialism itself.  Well-meaning Socialists opened the way for the National Socialists;  a Party dictatorship was established;  and the Party fell under the control of a single man.

The history of Socialism in Russia was no mere accident -- it followed the same inevitable line of development.  First came the establishment of the dictatorship of a Communist Party;  then the Communist Party became the instrument of a small central clique;  and finally, by a combination of murder and cajolery, Stalin established his personal dictatorship over that small clique.

All totalitarian societies tend towards the same final form.  Between Nazi and Communist there is no essential difference.  If we succumb to Stalin, we shall have beaten Hitler in vain.

Many Socialists do not mean to be re-actionaries -- but Socialism is Reaction.  The Factors of Authority always develop Socialism in the direction of the Slave State.



IV. SOCIALISM MEANS WAR

The two great conflicts of modern times have been caused by German aggression.  In both cases, that aggression came from totalitarian pressure inside Germany.

It is often overlooked that, although the pre-1914 German State was not Socialist in origin, nevertheless it had developed into the same kind of State towards which all Socialism tends.  All authority was concentrated;  economic and political power were amalgamated;  industries were "nationalised" at least in the sense that they were controlled in accordance with the "interests of the nation".  The nation itself was controlled by a single will and in accordance with "plan" -- just as the Socialist State must, in the long run, be controlled.

So while it would be unfair to say that German aggression in 1914 was caused by Socialism it would be entirely accurate to say that it was caused by the kind of set-up which Socialism creates.

German totalitarianism was broken in 1918;  but gradually over the next 15 years it was re-fashioned.  This time the German State came directly from Socialism, and showed plainly enough the course of Socialistic development;  but the Hitler regime only repeated and intensified the same evil features which had characterised the Kaiser's.  German aggression in 1939 was the direct sequel to Socialism.

To-day, the chief threat to world peace comes from a Socialist country -- Russia.  The Soviet system has developed to a degree of totalitarianism greater even than Hitler's, and is of necessity committed to the same policy of aggression.

Socialism provides both the motive and the means for war.  The Socialist dictator naturally sighs for more worlds to conquer;  he has no restraint of effective public opinion to curtail his adventures;  and the machinery of totalitarian government is particularly fitted to war-time mobilisation.

Socialist dictators seem naturally tempted to spread their own personal rule by force of arms;  and just as naturally they justify their aggression by asserting that they are only spreading the idea of Socialism.  Thus Napoleon claimed that he was only spreading the idea of the French Revolution;  thus the Kaiser and Hitler claimed that they were only spreading the benefits of German thoroughness and organisation;  and thus Stalin claims that he has the mission of spreading Communism, and it is now clear that he is preparing to spread it by force of arms.


THE DESIRE FOR CONQUEST

The pathological desire for conquest which seems to afflict these dictators no doubt springs in part from their own personal needs.  How can they maintain the loyalty of their own oppressed peoples unless they can attribute their sufferings to some foreign "oppressor"?  How can they prevent them becoming aware of the comparative poverty of their own lives, except by erecting a curtain of hostility to shut them off from intercourse with their more fortunate free neighbours?  How can they avoid internal resentments without external adventures?

Thus fear strengthens the dictator's natural ambition;  and, knowing that he must treat all freedom as hostile, he naturally hopes to have the initiative in attack.  He is apprehensive and dangerous in the same way and for the same reasons that a man-eating tiger is apprehensive and dangerous.  He knows that his own nature is such that man's hand must eventually be against him.

The world is not big enough for free and totalitarian systems to co-exist indefinitely in peace;  nor is it big enough for more than one socialist system.  The higher the degree of national integration -- the higher the degree of totalitarianism -- the greater are the occasions of conflict.  The totalitarian State, deflecting all normal feelings of decency towards itself, breaks down the individual's moral barriers and natural reluctances to war;  meanwhile it remains itself in a moral vacuum.  The pressure to expand is irresistible.  Once again, practical experience of the warlike natures of Socialist States verifies the theory.

To-day, when Socialist Russia is deliberately creating chaos in Europe to further her own aggressive ends, and is almost openly preparing for her attack on the West, and is only playing for time until she has the technical means for a successful attack, the real nature of Socialism is all too dreadfully illustrated.

It is no use trying to evade the issue by saying that Stalin is only an unfortunate historical accident, for which Socialism should accept no responsibility.  The fact is that dictators of the Stalin type (which is basically the same as the Hitler type) must eventually arise under any Socialist set-up.  Soviet aggression to-day is an inevitable consequence of Socialism -- though, once again, it is very far from the desires of the original Socialists.

The hope that Socialism on the international scale would usher in an era of world peace is just as fallacious as the hope that Socialism on the national scale would usher in an era of freedom.  No doubt both hopes have been honestly held by some -- but both are none the less vain.

The plain truth is -- Socialism Means War.



V. IF THE LIGHT OF THINE EYE BE DARKNESS ...

Socialism, then, has failed on both the national and international stages.  The doctrine was framed by idealists, who were irked at the limitations of life;  but it has only resulted in new limitations, fierce enough to make life unbearable.  It was meant as the antithesis to servitude -- and it has produced the Totalitarian State.

What has been the effect of this disaster upon the outlook of the Socialists?  On the great majority of the people who vote Socialist it has, as yet, had no effect.  Because most of the people who voted Socialist are not really Socialists at all -- they are only the followers of the active minorities of honest or of political Socialists.

This great passive majority, in fact, not yet even realise that there has been a disaster.  They press forward like the sheep at the rear of the flock (the simile is kinder than a reference to the Gadarene swine) unaware that their leaders are already at the edge of the precipice.  They still believe that everything is for the best in the best of all Socialist worlds -- do not their leaders tell them so?

But what of the small minority of active and honest Socialists?  They see what has happened and what is happening.  Why do they continue to press forward along the road whose end is now so clear and so ominous?

Doubtless the first inclination will be to condemn them outright for their folly and for their selfish stubborn pride, which forbids them to admit that they have been wrong.  Doubtless they merit condemnation;  doubtless, in the interests of our national salvation, they must be exposed -- but is it too much to ask that, along with

INSERT PAGES 26 & 27

can appeal to the bonds of old political associations and old personal friendships.

The Communist exploits the weaknesses of Socialism very cleverly and to their limit.  He knows very well that the nature of Socialism is such that it must, if maintained in power, develop a totalitarian Communist State.  He therefore plays up the "liberal" features of Socialism -- which must disappear in the event, but which are useful to him in the interim, because they help to keep the waverers in the Socialist camp.

Most of these waverers are honestly opposed to Communism, and do not realise how they are being made to play the Communist game.  Even in a national crisis or a general strike, when decent Labor men come out into open opposition to Communism, they fail to see that the forces which the Communists are using only come into existence as a result of principles still endorsed by the section of Socialists which repudiates Communism.  Every Socialist is, in fact, a Communist tool -- though in the vast majority of cases they are innocent tools, and do not understand who is using them or the purposes for which they are being used.

The honest Socialist, then, lives in a state of perpetual contradiction;  and even the political Socialist sometimes finds it difficult to tell which way to go.  Few political Socialists, of course, are honest -- they are men who live on the game, and who constantly remind themselves that they have got to live.

The intellectual difficulties and dilemmas of the honest Socialist do not cut much ice with the Labour politician -- it is votes he needs.  But if he is to get votes, then he dare not admit that anything is wrong with Socialism.  He, too, must brazen it out;  like the honest Socialist (though perhaps from a different motive) he must deny the manifest failure of Socialism.  He has a vested interest in it.


THE TRUTH HELD HACK

Thus circumstances conspire to keep the truth from the passive majority of Socialist voters.  Their political leaders may hesitate on their Socialist courses, but they will admit no hesitation -- because that would cost them votes.  The small minority of honest Socialists is not affected by this self-seeking;  but in their case the equally imperious urge of vanity forbids them to admit that they were wrong.

But the truth will out at last;  and when it does most of the unthinking Socialist followers will repudiate their erstwhile leaders, who will be left, stranded and not a little pathetic, by the receding Socialist tide.

Socialists have been a hard-working road-gang on the road to Hell.  But good intentions are not enough.

Meanwhile, we are watching the end of intellectual Socialism.  Either it must repudiate its own nature, or it must go over frankly to the Totalitarians.  The contradictions inherent in it are generating tensions which are no longer supportable.  The honest Socialists find it progressively more difficult to refrain from admitting the failure of Socialism;  and both they and the political Socialists are finding it progressively more difficult to conceal this failure from the masses.

That is why Socialism to-day is in its death-throes.  And (as has happened with death-throes before) never was it more dangerous.  It is impossible to predict the lengths to which Socialists may go when the collapse of their political machine becomes an immediate prospect.  Perhaps already there is a would-be Socialist Dictator preparing to make his Party face this last unwanted child of their old fond beliefs.



VI. LOOKING FORWARD

The Socialist road has turned out to be a dead end, and the disillusioned Socialist is at a loss which way to turn.

There is no need for him to face his problem with a heavy heart.  It may be true that the process of sloughing his personal beliefs will be painful, but the potentialities of the future are tremendous.  New techniques and vastly improved methods of production give prospect of rising living standards for all.

It would be foolish to pretend that everything will be easy.  No doubt there will be difficulties, but, if we face them in co-operation and with goodwill, they are certainly not insuperable.

Some twenty years ago there was a Depression;  for many a fearful and unforgettable experience.  That Depression arose through ignorance which we have now overcome.  To-day we know that, barring sabotage, there need never be another Depression, because we know the way to alleviate it and to cure it.

Barring sabotage -- but that is a big condition.  Unhappily sabotage is not impossible -- because Socialists have a vested interest in Depression.  The spread of the Socialist system in the 'thirties was largely the result of Depression -- and to-day there are Socialists who see their Party in decline, and argue that another Depression is the only means to revive it.

Allied to these Socialists, there are the forces of Soviet Russia.  Stalin wants to ruin the Western world.  He has already succeeded in spragging production in Europe, and in reducing it elsewhere by the means of the operations of his various Communist Parties.  Half the world now cannot live except on American charity -- and the transfer of resources to fill this Soviet-created gap imposes upon the normal economic system strains which test it to its limits.

Communist Parties (with their half-hearted Socialist allies) are pressing everywhere for measures which impose extra burdens upon all economic systems.  The raising of wages and the reduction of production are advocated concurrently, thus deliberately producing an inflationary situation.  Socialistic controls are invoked against this, but they only result in the diversion of trade from the open market to the black market.  Measures to cure the fundamental causes are bitterly contested by the clever Communist cliques.  The Socialists cannot oppose the Communists effectively (even if they want to) by reason of their own internal confusion.

Tremendous and unnecessary economic tensions are thus being generated, deliberately by the Soviet and half-unconsciously by the Socialists;  and it is by no means impossible that these tensions will issue in a Socialist Depression.  But it would be a mistake to regard such a Depression as inevitable -- we can beat it if we can get rid of the Socialists in time.


THE DISHONEST PAWNBROKER

Of course, even when we get rid of them, we will not immediately get rid of their effects, or even all the effects of the War.  During the War, we did, in fact, have to "put our liberties in pawn" -- we lowered our standards as a necessary condition of survival.  But perhaps not all of us foresaw that, even after the War, we should have to deal with a dishonest pawnbroker, unwilling to surrender our pledges.

Nevertheless, it should be recognised that controls are still necessary for so long as great internal tensions exist, and it would be courting disaster and condoning injustice to abolish controls without first mitigating the tensions.  Prices regulation and similar measures must stay on until there are the necessary goods available to satisfy reasonable demands.

But whereas the Socialist regards these controls as good in themselves (for they increase the power of the Socialist State) the free democrat regards them as a necessary evil.  Thus, under a system of Socialism, the general level of control moves upward;  but if we can get rid of Socialist governments we can slowly but steadily reduce controls, removing them one by one as they become superfluous.

Under a Socialist Government, of course, they never do become superfluous, because Socialist shortages always keep supply below demand.  To-day, an upsurge in production is necessary not only to raise our immediate living standards, but also to make possible the progressive removal of controls, thus ensuring that our living standards continue to move upwards.  We cannot hope to abolish all controls overnight -- but it is the general direction of movement in controls which is important, and which to-day provides the line of demarcation between Socialism and Freedom.

The present disequilibrium, arising as a consequence of the War, gives an unique opportunity for Socialist sabotage and the precipitation of a Socialist Depression.  Once we can get rid of that disequilibrium, however, we need not have the same fear.  We now know quite well how to prevent a Depression such as the last one overtaking us.

People turned to Socialism partly as a blind reaction to Depression.  They did not know what Socialism involved;  but by now they start to see that the evils of Socialism are far worse even than the Depression evils, and, in fact, they see that Socialism, so far from providing the hoped-for remedy against Depression, is to-day the most dangerous factor operating to cause a Depression.  And now that, apart from Socialist sabotage, we know how to prevent Depression, there is not the same temptation for unthinking people to jump out of the frying pan into the fire.

If only we can get rid of the Socialist blight and the Soviet menace, then our new production techniques offer us an age of unparalled plenty, and our new economic techniques offer us security for all.

These are not discouraging prospects -- even for a disillusioned Socialist.



ENDNOTES

1.  V.I. Lenin -- The April Conference.  Speech in favour of the Resolution on the political situation.  See Little Lenin Library, Vol. 10, p. 29.

Thursday, April 08, 1993

The Fightback should continue by another title

The coalition came close to winning government last month and should hang on to its current policies.

BY CONTRAST with the 1990 election held in the early stages of recession, the March 1993 election was not a good one to lose.  Many major overseas economies continue to struggle but, with luck, the worst of the debt-overhang problems from the spending extravaganza of the 1980s may now be passing, both here and overseas.  Growth and employment will be slow to recover, and unemployment is likely to remain considerably higher than in the 1980s.

But if the right policies are followed, the Government should be able to capitalise on the dramatic reduction in cost levels wrought by the recession and make Australia a truly cost-competitive country internationally.  Given the policies, Labor could enter the 1996 election with the economy moving to sustainable higher growth and the coalition could be struggling for the rest of the 1990s.

This raises the question, which both political parties face:  what are those "right" policies?  In his article (The Age, 30/3), Robert Manne categorised alternatives which implied that the Liberals have five options -- no change, no change except for the GST, warm and dry, social conservatism with economic rationalism, and new protectionism.

These possibilities -- and more -- seem to have been reflected in last week's Liberal postmortem.  Manne himself obviously favours new protectionism, which without offering evidence he weirdly suggests is "more likely to appeal to the more open-minded and pragmatic members of the younger Liberal generation".

One trouble with such simple classifications is that they focus on points of difference within the coalition and between it and Labor, as well as on minority viewpoints, and they ignore the considerable amount of common ground.

IT IS laughable to suggest, for example, that the Liberals have "been in the hands of a group of radical free-marketeers" for the past 10 years.

Libertarians would certainly be astonished to learn that Dr Manne also puts me in that category.

Manne's attempts to brush aside the main cause of the election defeat are also unconvincing.  Very few now disagree that, without the 15 per cent GST, the coalition would have won the election.

That they got so close even with the GST (only 1500 votes short across eight marginal seats) surely confirms that, after 10 years in office, with a million unemployed and a net foreign debt of $168 billion, Labor would have lost convincingly without the GST.

This is not to say that the rest of the coalition's policies were all appropriately framed, or trouble-free from a political viewpoint.  For one thing, without the authority of government and public service back-up, the coalition was unwise to offer so much detail.  With Dr Hewson expending so much energy defending the GST, the benefits of other policies were also undersold.

But the explosion of analyses by people on the right of politics since the election may largely be redundant anyway.  As Mr Keating said on election eve:  "There is no question about change.  I have no doubt Australians are tired of it, but equally I have no doubt they accept the need for it."

The art of politics is to find the middle ground.  Mr Keating's record suggests that he is likely to seek the middle ground in economic policy by moving ahead with structural change in industrial relations, government services and industry protection to improve productivity and increase Australia's competitiveness.

A recent report to the Business Council of Australia showed that average productivity levels in Australia's leading companies are 25 to 50 per cent below world-best practice and that since 1988 there has been no closing of this "productivity gap".

It concluded that, notwithstanding moves in the right direction, the present industrial relations system does not allow business to make the changes needed to catch up.

BECAUSE of its close links with unions, Labor has found it difficult to break down their privileged position in industrial relations and associated arrangements.

While Mr Keating has consistently argued that it is Labor that "dragged" Australia out of isolation into the global economy, in practice structural reform under Labor was slow, piecemeal and continually retarded by union resistance.

Now, however, Mr Keating sees himself as "emperor" riding an invigorated and competitive economy horse into South-East Asia.  He will have to apply the whip and possibly even the spurs to unions, business and government.

To the extent that Mr Keating steals the structural-change clothes of Fightback, this could be the central problem faced by the coalition.

Indeed, unless Labor presses ahead with structural reforms on a broad front, our economy will remain relatively stagnant because it will not attract the business investment necessary for improved living standards and lower unemployment.

In the new reality of the global economy -- a reality which has passed the new protectionists by -- competitiveness is the name of the game.

Witness the recent comments by the chairman of Amcor, Stan Wallis, and the latest developments at Heinz, indicating that Australia is not competitive for the international capital dollar.

What this suggests is that, if they are to stand a chance in 1996, the coalition parties will have little practical choice but to advocate most of the Fightback reforms -- but by another name.

With Labor pursuing structural reforms in a corporatist-centralist vein, the only real alternative for the coalition will be to argue for a more market-oriented, less government-interventionist strategy on grounds of efficiency, equity and freedom from Big Brother in Canberra.

If they adopt a strategy of more government intervention and a return to the past, the coalition will simply become irrelevant.


ADVERTISEMENT