Communications Minister Helen Coonan's attempts at policy reform have so far been conspicuous failures. Telstra's fibre to the node network was scuttled by her requirement that Telstra build it and then give control over it to the regulator. And now what was already a timid "media reform" package has been watered down almost to the level of pointlessness.
The coalition's proposed changes to media laws were obsolete on the day they were released. They were an attempt to deal policy into the frenzied technological change taking place in the unregulated parts of the media and telecommunications sector.
In March, the day the government released its media discussion paper, Apple released for download and purchase on its iTunes service High School Musical. The movie has been a huge success with the "tween" market (children between the ages of eight and 12). It cannot be seen at the cinemas, it's available only on DVD and via the internet. Movie distributors had learnt the lesson from music distributors' failure half a decade ago -- consumers are migrating their entertainment onto the internet, and are happy to pay for the privilege.
This week we saw the final watering down of the media package and the sale of YouTube to Google -- $US1.65 billion ($2.2 billion) for 67 employees and a website.
None of Apple, YouTube, Google or Microsoft made submissions or appeared at the Senate inquiry into the government's media legislation. Telstra gave evidence only about the mobile television licence. These companies didn't need to get involved in debates about old media. No reform package can stop the migration of consumers from traditional media into more exciting and more flexible formats.
Now, with the release of Telstra's Next G network, the transition from old to new media is firmly under way. Certainly, the wireless network is slower than the scuttled fibre to the node network, but it doesn't take much to happily stream a YouTube video onto a mobile phone. Next G speeds are already faster than those that many consumers have piped into their home, and are set to increase in speed tenfold.
When Prime Minister John Howard says media reform is only a second-order priority, he is more prescient than he realises. The creative storms of change will blow no matter what is in the Broadcasting Services Act.
The Holy Grail of modern communications has long been obvious: high-speed internet. If this is available on mobile devices, consumers can watch video from any service, read their email from any provider and browse any website with the same freedom they have in front of their computers at home. But Australia has a regulatory environment dramatically at odds with technological and cultural developments here and overseas.
What was the debate about? The "diversity" cry rings hollow -- on the internet, an infinite array of content and opinion is available to anybody who cares to look. Online media services, still in their infancy, can deliver more diverse content than can be consumed in a lifetime.
But political debate about media ownership always ends up with politicians pontificating about the relative merits of media content. Genuine deregulation means that this decision would be made entirely by consumers. In a deregulated market, what people want on television or radio, people get.
By forcing local radio stations to broadcast a minimum of local content, the politicians say they know better than consumers what should be broadcast. It is an attempt to force consumers to pay for politicians' public visibility -- elsewhere this would be called corruption. By restricting the ability for stations to respond to consumer demand, the reform package condemns many independent broadcasters to failure.
Local media produces niche products that can be supplied by other vehicles. Whether product is supplied on the same radio transmitter as 50 years ago, or a podcast inaugurated 50 days ago, should be of no concern to legislators.
Outside the realm of government regulation, we have innovative, dynamic companies responsive to market demand. Within its reach, we have an industry being variously protected and attacked by flawed public policy and political manoeuvring. Unsurprisingly, audiences for unregulated new media are growing faster.
Traditional media still have a role. But when the government imposes new regulations and fails to strip away the old ones, that role is looking more and more perilous.
No comments:
Post a Comment