Why is it that public discussion of Aboriginal issues involves so much misrepresentation? Geoffrey Partington's Hasluck versus Coombs certainly contains many errors of fact and dubious interpretations. But despite Gerard Henderson's claim (Herald, July 2), praise for the work of A.O. Neville, the West Australian "Chief Protector" of Aborigines, is not one of Partington's sins, as anyone can verify by reading page 27 of the book, the only page on which Neville is mentioned.
No comments:
Post a Comment